Could the IRS let everyone file taxes for free? Why Congress is considering cutting out the middlemen - CNBC

Come tax time, just about everyone has at one point or another found themselves wondering the same thing: "If the IRS knows how much I owe, why do I have to calculate this myself?"

For many, that leads to a second question too: "Why am I paying a middleman to help me file?"

The U.S. government is wondering the same thing. The recently passed Inflation Reduction Act provides $15 million for the IRS to study how it could implement a program that allows Americans to file their taxes for free. A resulting report, which must include third-party input, is due before Congress in nine months.

The program would theoretically replace the current free filing program, which isn't available to all taxpayers and isn't widely used by eligible filers. It would also no longer rely on partnerships with private tax prep firms, meaning the IRS could one day send you a bill directly for what you owe, experts say.

"Tax nerds like me will be getting our popcorn out to watch," says Robert Cordasco, a certified public accountant and founder of Cordasco & Co. in Savannah, Georgia. "Everything about free filing has been a disaster for a decade at least."

Below, tax pros explain why Congress is exploring this now, why major tax preparers oppose such a move and why you may have to wait a while before you can file your taxes for free.

Why the IRS is exploring free filing now

The IRS last explored the idea of free tax filing in the early 2000s, but major tax preparation firms lobbied hard against it.

In a resulting compromise, the IRS agreed to drop the idea of offering its own program provided that a group of tax preparers, including TurboTax maker Intuit and H&R Block, provide free filing services to Americans under a certain income threshold.  

The program, known as IRS Free File, proved to be extremely flawed. Although it is currently available to individuals making $73,000 or less — around 70% of taxpayers — only 3% of eligible filers used the program in 2020, according to a report from the Government Accountability Office.

In 2019, a ProPublica Investigation found that Intuit and other firms were deliberately attempting to lead users away from the free versions of their programs. Following federal investigations and lawsuits from the states attorneys general, Intuit admitted no wrongdoing, but paid out a $141 million settlement to users of its service who qualified for Free File but instead paid for tax preparation.

Over the past two years, Intuit and H&R Block — the nation's largest tax preparers by far — have withdrawn from the Free File program.

With the agreement with major tax preparers effectively dissolved, "the IRS is now free to develop its own program," says Glenn Borst, senior legal analyst at Wolters Kluwer Legal and Regulatory U.S. "There's no reason it shouldn't work just as well, but it's going to provoke a lot of lobbying by the companies."

An IRS free filing program could work, but will take time

Tax preparation companies argue that free online filing through the IRS wouldn't necessarily be a win for taxpayers.

"Taxpayers see an inherent conflict of interest in having the IRS be the tax collector, investigator, auditor, enforcer and now preparer," said Rick Heineman, vice president of corporate communications at Intuit, as part of a longer statement given to ProPublica.

Although for-profit tax preparers have a clear financial incentive to take this position, it is worth questioning whether the IRS would be incentivized under a free filing system to maximize refunds (or minimize tax liability) for filers using its system.

"There are certainly political figures who would say it's like a fox guarding the henhouse," says Borst. "But the IRS will of its own accord point out if a customer misses a deduction. And if under a new system the IRS is missing obvious deductions, H&R Block and TurboTax will be able to say, 'They didn't get you this, and we did.'"

For millions of Americans with straightforward tax situations, a free filing program could be a massive benefit. Between 41% and 48% of all returns could be pre-populated based on taxpayers' previous filings and current-year financial documents from employers, according to recent research published by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

"So many returns are just pure math. It wouldn't take much to automate it, send the result to the taxpayer and have them validate it," says Cordasco. "People don't trust the IRS, but for the simplest of returns, the option should be there for people to file without so much complexity and cost."

But don't expect to have the option to file your taxes by the next time you file, or even the year after that.

"If you look at what the bill does, you can get a feel for Congress's priorities," says Borst. The $15 million Congress is spending to look into this idea pales in comparison to the nearly $80 billion allocated to the IRS for purposes such as hiring more agents, increasing audits and updating aging computer systems.

"Something like this will likely require further appropriation," says Cordasco.

Sign up now: Get smarter about your money and career with our weekly newsletter

Don't miss: Will student loan forgiveness make inflation worse? Here’s what economists say

Adblock test (Why?)

Could the IRS let everyone file taxes for free? Why Congress is considering cutting out the middlemen - CNBC
Read More

MLB free agent rankings: Early look at top 20 players, including Aaron Judge, Jacob deGrom and Clayton Kershaw - CBS Sports

Getty Images

Savvy shoppers know that it's never too early to start planning ahead. There are five weeks remaining in Major League Baseball's regular season, meaning we're at least two months away from the start of free agency. Still, with Labor Day upcoming, we figured this would be a good time to preview the winter's class -- and to give fans of noncompetitive teams some hope about who might be on their roster next year.

Below, you'll find our first draft of the class' top 20 free agents. As always, the rankings are based on an unscientific combination of a player's true talent level (how they can reasonably be forecasted to perform in the future)  and their expected annual average value. Players with options were included (or excluded) using the following rule of thumb: all team options are exercised; all player options are not. That's not realistic -- some players will opt in and some teams will opt out -- but it's a fairer solution than leaving it up to our read on a situation this far out.

Do note that these rankings are subject to change between now and the official publication of our top 50 list. There are games left to be played, after all.

Let's get to the list.

CBS Sports HQ Newsletter

Your Ultimate Guide to Every Day in Sports

We bring sports news that matters to your inbox, to help you stay informed and get a winning edge.

Please check the opt-in box to acknowledge that you would like to subscribe.

Thanks for signing up!

Keep an eye on your inbox.

Sorry!

There was an error processing your subscription.

Judge raised eyebrows in the spring when he rejected an extension offer worth $213 million. Front-office types were quick to point to his advanced age (he'll turn 31 next April) and his injury history as reasons he should've taken the deal. As it turns out, he was right to bet on himself. He's in the midst of possibly the finest walk season in history, a campaign that could soon double as the league's first 60-homer effort in two decades. That Judge is closing in on Roger Maris while primarily playing center field speaks to his unusual blend of power and athleticism. He isn't Richie Sexson or Kyle Blanks or some other lumbering giant of the past. He isn't a one-year wonder, either. The only person to accumulate more WAR than Judge during the Pandemic Era is Paul Goldschmidt -- and he might win the National League Triple Crown. Judge can't change his age or his injury history, but he's done everything within his power (literally) to boost his stock. He should be rewarded handsomely for it come winter.

Arenado has reportedly signaled that he doesn't intend to opt out of his current contract with St Louis. Fair enough. Our blanket treatment of these situations means that he gets a spot on here regardless. Arenado is in the midst of a phenomenal season, one that's being overshadowed only by teammate Paul Goldschmidt. He's a little older than some of the position players to follow, so you could argue he should be lower on the list. The rise in popularity of the short-term, AAV-heavy deal makes us put him here anyway. But again, none of this may matter on the final list if Arenado decides he's content with his situation. 

Statistically, Turner has been one of the handful of best position players in the majors during the Pandemic Era. It's easy to understand how. He remains a tolerable shortstop option who has consistently hit for a high average while providing above-average power and speed production. To wit, if 20/20 seasons were 19/20 seasons, they wouldn't sound as cool but Turner would have three of them instead of one. (He's on the cusp of a second.) There are some drawbacks to Turner's game worth mentioning: He might have to move across the bag at some point during his next contract, and he's whiffed and chased more frequently this season than usual. Neither spells doom for him, at least not yet; both do merit monitoring, however.

Although deGrom went more than a year in between appearances because of various injuries, and although he's yet to crack 200 combined innings since the start of the 2020 season, he's reaffirmed that he intends to opt out this winter. With the way he's performed since returning to the Mets rotation this month, why not? What's clear is that he feels confident he can fetch more than the two years and $65 million remaining on his contract. (Half of that is tied up in a club option.) What's unclear is if deGrom will be able to secure his payday as part of a long-term contract, or if the combination of his age (he's 34) and his recent absences will ferry him toward a shorter, AAV-heavy deal, similar to the one Max Scherzer signed last winter.

Remember, we're assuming that everyone who can opt out will opt out. Correa signed a three-year pact with the Twins last offseason that amounted to a series of one-year deals, each worth $35.1 million. Should he again test the market, he'll get to choose once more between maximizing his earnings and securing a long-term home. Either way, it'll be interesting to see how Correa is received this winter. He's having nearly the same offensive campaign as he did last year when his numbers are adjusted for his run-scoring environment, yet his month-to-month splits have deviated more than they did in 2021. Bill James once theorized that players who start hot are perceived better than players who end hot, since the former route allows the player's numbers to look better for longer. Is there a similar psychic effect working against players who swing between hot and cold months? Perhaps we'll find out this winter.

Bogaerts needn't look further than his own double-play partner, Trevor Story, to know that he can do better than the three years and $60 million remaining on his contract. (Story, for reference, received a $23 million AAV last offseason.) He's been a reliably well-above-average hitter for the last five seasons and he's done well to remain at shortstop this deep into his career. If there's one bugaboo here (beyond the possibility that he slides to third base or another position) it's that his power production is at its lowest since 2017. Bogaerts recently disclosed that he's been dealing with shoulder and wrist woes since colliding with a teammate in May. It would seem more reasonable than not to assume those developments are related.

We were bearish on Rodón last offseason because of his lengthy injury history and his scant record of being a dominant force in the majors. The league may have shared our reservations, as he ended up signing a two-year deal with the Giants that included a vesting player option if he cleared 110 innings. (Clearly he did.) Some mistakes you have to make only once. Rodón has again struck out nearly a third of the batters he's faced by following a simple formula: fastballs up, sliders down. There's not much more to it, just sheer force. Power left-handed starters are always in demand, and we suspect that Rodón will not suffer for long-term offers this winter. 

Swanson runs the risk of being overshadowed by the bigger-name shortstops in this class. It shouldn't be lost on anyone that he's developed into the kind of performer teams would be happy to take at No. 1. He's been an above-average hitter in two of the last three seasons (the exception saw him homer 27 times), and he's a more-than-capable defensive shortstop. Factor in how Swanson receives praise for being a leader in the clubhouse, and there's a lot to like about him and his game. If there is one glowing big-picture concern about him, it's the frequency with which he swings and misses. Swanson ranks 133rd out of the 144 qualifying batters in contact rate, putting him down there with the likes of Nelson Cruz, Josh Donaldson, and Nick Castellanos. In the interest of full disclosure, top-shelf rookies like Julio Rodríguez and Jeremy Peña are right around his contact rate. The difference is that they're a fair amount younger, giving them a longer runway before they start to have their bat speed, hand-eye coordination, and other physical skills diminish. Swanson will turn only 29 next February, so he still has some good years ahead of him. We just wonder if the back-end of his inevitable long-term deal could become hairier than you'd think.

Where have all the good center fielders gone? The trade market was barren this deadline, and this winter's crop isn't great, either. Nimmo is the exception. He's a prototypical leadoff hitter who commands the strike zone and who has a good feel for contact. Some of the advanced defensive metrics are fond of his work on the grass, too, particularly when he has to charge in to make the play. The catch with Nimmo is his availability. He made his big-league debut in 2016, yet this year is just the second in which he's cleared the 100-game threshold. (He did play in 55 of the Mets' 60 games in 2020.) There's also the matter of whether or not these Mets would allow a quality starter to depart for greener pastures without a true successor in place. Perhaps those factors will counterbalance one another. 

It's one thing to write that Contreras is among the best hitting catchers in the majors, it's another to illustrate it. Here's our attempt: he's hit so well this season that his production is on par with the likes of Matt Olson and Rhys Hoskins, two highly regarded first basemen. Why isn't Contreras higher on this list? We're not sure if anyone will pay him what he's worth because of the league's defensive predilections. He has a strong arm and he's obsessed with attempting backpicks, yet he ranks in the 29th percentile in framing, according to Statcast. Front offices will stomach all-mitt catchers because they're an efficient way to add runs by improving the pitching staff. The inverse profile, the one Contreras sports, isn't as enticing for two obvious reasons: 1) he won't get your pitchers beneficial calls; and 2) you have to actually pony up for offense. Will someone do that for Contreras? Again, we're skeptical.

We just went through this last winter with Kershaw. Despite rumors that he might join the Rangers, the closest thing he has to a hometown team, he elected to remain with the Dodgers for another season. Whether or not Kershaw entertains heading to Arlington this winter is to be seen. For as well as he's performed, his price is likely to remain reasonable because of his limited availability: both in terms of his health and his (seeming) unwillingness to entertain offers from other teams.

12. Edwin Díaz, RHP, New York Mets

Díaz is the best reliever on the market. He has it all. An electric slider-fastball combination. An unreal ability to get down the mound (his release point is more than seven feet in front of the pitching rubber). A made-for-television entrance. And, presumably, a great chance at toppling Liam Hendriks' $18 million AAV, the highest ever awarded to a relief pitcher. Díaz is even in pursuit of Aroldis Chapman's single-season record for highest strikeout-per-nine rate. In other words, his fielders are free to make like Lupe Fiasco and end their nights right where the horns are.

Our guess is that Abreu's winter will play out similarly to the one he experienced in 2019, his first foray into free agency. If you're drawing a blank on what happened it's for good reason: it didn't take long for him to accept the White Sox's qualifying offer. (The two sides subsequently agreed to a multi-year pact.) Should Abreu actively test the waters, he'll make for an interesting case study. He's remained a highly productive hitter, and he's sporting would-be career-best walk and strikeout rates. He's also a 35-year-old right-right first baseman who is on pace to finish with a career-low home-run total. That doesn't sound like the kind of profile that other teams are going to break the bank for, leaving the White Sox in the catbird seat.

Rizzo was a free agent last offseason when he signed a two-year pact with the Yankees. The deal allows him to opt out after this season, and it seems reasonable to think he will, given how he's exceeded expectations. Rizzo is having his most productive effort since 2019 as judged by OPS+. He's also on the verge of delivering his first 30-homer campaign since 2017, or the year after the Cubs won the World Series. A lot has changed since then. Rizzo is no longer one of the youthful faces of a potential dynasty; he's a 33-year-old first baseman with a history of back concerns. This might be his last chance for multiple years, and he should take advantage of the situation.

Brantley underwent a season-ending shoulder surgery earlier this month, complicating his free agency. He will always hit, but he's getting up there in age (he'll turn 36 early next season) and there's no telling if his shoulder will have a lasting effect. He seems like a good candidate for a lucrative one-year deal, be it as part of a return to the Astros or in joining some other contender looking for a lefty stick.

16. Andrew Heaney, LHP, Los Angeles Dodgers

Heaney is almost certain to be a misrank, either high or low. He's been brilliant when he's pitched this season, but he's appeared only nine times. There are compelling reasons to believe he's improved in sustainable ways, including the implementation of a sweeper and refined mechanics, but he's appeared only nine times. And so on. (Did we mention that he's appeared only nine times?) If we had to guess, the most likely outcome here is him re-signing with the Dodgers on a short-term deal that provides him a chance to Prove It before he gets his big payday. Perhaps we're mistaken in that respect. It almost surely won't be the last time we're wrong here.

Bassitt technically signed an extension with the Mets in May that allowed the two sides to avoid arbitration. The pact included a $19 million mutual option for next season that, in a sense, doubled as an insurance policy. If Bassitt (who, in approaching his 34th birthday, is older than you think he is) hurt himself or his stock this summer, then at least he could stand to make bank next year on what amounted to a pillow contract. There's little reason to think that his side of the option will get exercised. He missed a week in July with a non-injury designation, and he's now closing in on a career-high amount of innings. The quality of his work has remained high, too. This could be the last contract he signs as a big-league player. He should aim high.

There appear to be several red flags with Martinez. His OPS+ is the lowest it's been for a regulation-length season since he was with the Astros. His homer total is barely higher than it was in 2020 despite him appearing in twice as many games. He just celebrated his 35th birthday. And yes, he continues to offer negative secondary value. Nevertheless, Martinez's ball-tracking data suggests his bat is healthier than all the above information makes it sound: he still hits the ball hard (albeit not as hard and not as frequently as he used to) and he launches it within that sweet, sweet 10-to-30-degree window about as often as anyone in the game. In some respects, Martinez could be this winter's Anthony Rizzo: a veteran who might have one big year left in them. You just have to be willing to take the risk to find out for sure.

Eovaldi, currently out with lower back inflammation, is a tough pitcher to place. He's been an above-average starter for most of the last four seasons, but there are some signs of decay present in his game. He lost another mile per hour off his fastball this season, and his quality-of-contact data got worse. Yes, Eovaldi has always been more prone to loud contact than the average bear; so far this year, however, nearly 48 percent of his batted balls allowed have had an exit velocity north of 95 mph. For perspective, his rate in that same category over the last four seasons was 38.6 percent. Teams will have to decide if that's a blip or a slip before they pony up.

20. Martín Pérez, LHP, Texas Rangers

One secret to these rankings is that once you get past a certain point it's just a bunch of coin flips. There's no difference between Nos. 19 and 20, or 20 and 21. Not really. All of this preamble to explain that Pérez gets this spot because it was always going to one of those veteran pop-up starter types -- be it him, Michael Wacha, or Tyler Anderson. You can make a case for any of the three; Pérez, who has mastered the ability to suppress contact quality by locating his sinker and changeup, just so happened to get the nod here. He's expressed interest in staying with the Rangers.

Adblock test (Why?)

MLB free agent rankings: Early look at top 20 players, including Aaron Judge, Jacob deGrom and Clayton Kershaw - CBS Sports
Read More

Edinson Cavani joins Valencia on free transfer - ESPN

3:41 PM ET

• ESPN

Edinson Cavani spent two seasons with Manchester United. Matthew Peters/Manchester United via Getty Images

Uruguay striker Edinson Cavani has joined Valencia on a free transfer, the Spanish club announced on Monday.

The 35-year-old former Manchester United and Paris Saint-Germain star is set to sign a two-year contract at the Mestalla.

- Stream ESPN FC Daily on ESPN+ (U.S. only)
- Don't have ESPN? Get instant access

Cavani became a free agent after his contract with United expired at the end of the 2021-22 season. He had also been linked with a move back to France with Nice.

Cavani will join up with fellow Uruguay striker Maxi Gomez under Italian head coach Gennaro Gattuso.

Adblock test (Why?)

Edinson Cavani joins Valencia on free transfer - ESPN
Read More

T-Mobile Magenta Max subscribers will now get free Apple TV Plus - The Verge

T-Mobile led the way in bundling mobile and entertainment services together, but now competitors like Verizon are doing the same to incentivize their subscribers to stick around. With that in mind, T-Mobile is trying to sweeten the pot a bit more with the addition of free Apple TV Plus. The new perk will be available starting August 31st for customers on the company’s Magenta Max plan.

Thankfully for T-Mobile customers, gaining Apple’s service doesn’t mean giving up Netflix. The carrier will continue to offer its long-running “Netflix on us” deal, which similarly provides free streaming access for as long as you’re a T-Mobile customer. Just keep in mind that the Netflix perk is limited to the basic, standard definition tier for most plans unless you’re on a multi-line Magenta Max plan. Whereas with Apple TV Plus, you’ll get full 4K streaming even on a single-line Max plan.

T-Mobile had previously been offering a free year of Apple TV Plus on many eligible T-Mobile and Sprint plans. But since access will be ongoing for Max customers, that promotion will be halved to six months for other plans like the standard Magenta tier. Aside from Apple TV Plus and Netflix, T-Mobile also offers a free year of Paramount Plus, plus monthly discounts on YouTube TV and Philo TV, both of which are $10 off for one year.

While it won’t give you Netflix or Apple TV Plus, Verizon’s big counter to T-Mobile is the inclusion of the Disney bundle — including Disney Plus, Hulu, and ESPN Plus — on its 5G Get More and 5G Play More unlimited plans. Verizon also offers Apple Music, Apple Arcade, Google Play Pass, and other incentives depending on the plan.

Both T-Mobile and Verizon are now providing widespread 5G coverage and speedy performance, according to PCMag’s latest tests. AT&T is lagging behind somewhat in urban areas, but that could level out over the next couple years. With mobile data speeds starting to get so similar between all of them, these entertainment and streaming bonuses might swing customers to one carrier or the other. AT&T doesn’t seem interested in pursuing the same strategy, however. Following the merger of WarnerMedia and Discovery, the carrier stopped including complimentary HBO Max with its plans.

Last week, T-Mobile and SpaceX revealed their plan to bring satellite connectivity to mobile phones in 2023. The goal of “Coverage Above and Beyond” is to eliminate signal dead zones and provide enough data throughput for sending texts and messages in regions where it’s not currently possible. T-Mobile has said that “the vast majority of smartphones already on T-Mobile’s network will be compatible with the new service.”

Adblock test (Why?)

T-Mobile Magenta Max subscribers will now get free Apple TV Plus - The Verge
Read More

US government to end free at-home Covid test program this week - CNN

(CNN)The federal government is ending its free at-home Covid-19 test program this week, citing a lack of funding and efforts to preserve supply ahead of an anticipated fall surge in cases, a White House official told CNN on Sunday.

Both the White House and the website where people can claim their tests blamed Congress for failing to provide additional funding for the program, which provided up to 16 free tests per household since the beginning of the year.

"Ordering through this program will be suspended on Friday, September 2 because Congress hasn't provided additional funding to replenish the nation's stockpile of tests," the Covid.gov website reads.

The administration launched the initiative, which shipped rapid tests to Americans via the United States Postal Service, in January amidst a wave in Omicron variant cases and limited testing availability. However, officials have warned for months that, absent additional funding from Congress, the administration would be forced to roll back its Covid-19 response efforts.

"We have warned that Congressional inaction would force unacceptable tradeoffs and harm our overall COVID-19 preparedness and response—and that the consequences would likely worsen over time," the White House official told CNN. "Unfortunately, because of the limited funding we have to work with, we have had to make impossible choices about which tools and programs to invest in—and which ones we must downsize, pause, or end all together."

Still, the official said the administration would "expeditiously resume distribution of free tests through COVIDTests.gov" if and when Congress allocates additional funding, but "[u]ntil then, we believe reserving the remaining tests for distribution later this year is the best course."

Adblock test (Why?)

US government to end free at-home Covid test program this week - CNN
Read More

How to Watch VMAs 2022 Live Online Free: Where to Stream MTV Video Music Awards - STYLECASTER

And the Moon Person goes to…If you’e a fan of BLACKPINK, Bad Bunny (or just music in general), you may want to know how to watch the VMAs 2022 live online for free so you don’t miss a single performance.

The first MTV Video Music Awards were held on September 14, 1984, with Madonna, Tina Turner, David Bowie, Rod Stewart and more as performers. Since then, the VMAs, which were originally created as an alternative to the Grammys but for music videos, have been a cultural phenomenon with millions of viewers and votes each year. Unlike the Grammys, which are voted on by members of the Recording Academy, the VMAs are voted on by fans who come together to snag their favorite artists a Moon Person award. The award, which features a silver astronaut with an MTV flag, was changed from Moon Man to Moon Person in 2017 to be inclusive of all genders. “Why should it be a man?” Chris McCarthy, president of MTV, told the New York Times in 2017. “It could be a man, it could be a woman, it could be transgender, it could be nonconformist.”

As fans know, the VMAs have also been the home to countless water cooler moments, from the 2009 show where Kanye West interrupted Taylor Swift to the 2015 show where Nicki Minaj called out Miley Cyrus. The VMAs are never short of viral moments and performances. If you don’t have cable or a TV, read on ahead for how to watch the VMAs 2022 live online for free.

Our mission at STYLECASTER is to bring style to the people, and we only feature products we think you’ll love as much as we do. Sling TV is a STYLECASTER sponsor, however, all products in this article were independently selected by our editors. Please note that if you purchase something by clicking on a link within this story, we may receive a small commission of the sale.

Image: Manny Carabel/Getty Images for MTV.

When are the VMAs 2022?

The MTV Video Music Awards air on Sunday, August 28, 2022, at 8 p.m. ET / 5 p.m. PT on MTV. The show will also be simulcast on The CW, BET, BET Her, CMT, Comedy Central, Logo, MTV2, Nickelodeon, Paramount Network, Pop, TV Land and VH1.

How to watch VMAs 2022 live

How can fans watch the VMAs 2022 live? The MTV Video Music Awards air on MTV, which is available to stream on Sling TV, Philo TV, Hulu+ With Live TV and Fubo TV. Sling TV starts at $17.50 for the first month; Philo TV offers a seven-day free trial and starts at $25 per month; Fubo TV offers a seven-day free trial and starts at $64.99 per month; Hulu+ With Live TV starts at $69.99 per month and includes free subscriptions to Disney Plus and ESPN Plus. Read on for a breakdown of each service and how to watch the VMAs 2022 live online for free.

Sling TV Sling TV offers three plans: Sling Orange, which is suited for college sports and families; Sling Blue, which is suited for professional sports and news; and Sling Orange & Blue, which includes both plans. Both Sling Orange and Sling Blue offer BET and Comedy Central, where the VMAs 2022 will be simulcast with MTV.

Sling Orange and Sling Blue each cost $35 per month, while Sling Orange & Blue costs $50 per month and includes a combination package of both plans. However, Sling has a current deal where new subscribers can sign up for any plan for 50 percent off their first month, which cuts the price of Sling Orange and Sling Blue to $17.50 and Sling Orange & Blue to $25 for a new subscriber’s first month. The deal makes Sling the cheapest live TV streaming service on the market right now. Sling TV also has a current add-on promotion where new subscribers can receive one month of Showtime, Starz and EPIX for free. The promotion saves users $24 from subscribing to Showtime ($10 per month), Starz ($9 per month) and EPIX ($5 per month) as add-ons without the deal.

Sling Orange & Blue offers 47 channels, 50 hours of DVR storage and the ability to stream on up to three devices. Sling Blue offers 41 channels, 50 hours of DVR storage and the ability to stream on up to three devices. Sling Orange offers 31 channels, 50 hours of DVR storage and the ability to stream on one device. All Sling TV plans also include more than 10,000 hours of on-demand shows, movies and other content.

How to watch the VMAs 2022 live online for free

How can fans watch the VMAs 2022 live online for free? Read on for how to watch the MTV Video Music Awards at no cost.

Philo TV offers a seven-day free trial and costs $25 per month after the trial ends. Philo TV also offers seven-day free trials for its add-on channel packages: Movies & More  (Cinémoi, HDNet Movies, MGM HD, Reelz and Sony Movies); Epix (Epix, Epix Hits and Epix2); and Starz (Starz, Starz Encore and Starz Kids & Family). After the trials end, subscribers can add various channel packages for between $3 to $9 per month. Movies & More (Cinémoi, HDNet Movies, MGM HD, Reelz and Sony Movies) costs $3 per month; Epix (Epix, Epix Hits and Epix2) costs $6 per month; and Starz (Starz, Starz Encore and Starz Kids & Family) cost $9 per month.

Philo offers 64 channels, including MTV to watch the VMAs 2022 , as well as a DVR service that allows subscribers to record an unlimited amount of live or upcoming content and save it for up to 12 months. Philo also allows subscribers to stream on up to three devices at the same time, and create up to 10 profiles per account.

Fubo TV offers seven-day free trials for its Starter, Pro and Elite plans. Fubo’s Starter plan includes 116 channels, a DVR with 250 hours of space, and the ability to stream on up to three screens at the same time. The Pro plan includes 116 channels, a DVR with 1,000 hours of space, and the ability to stream on up to 10 screens at the same time. The Elite plan includes 210 channels, a DVR with 1,000 hours of space, and the ability to stream on 10 screens at the same time. Each plan includes MTV to watch the VMAs 2022.

Fubo starts at $64.99 per month for its Starter plan. The next level up is the Pro plan, which costs $69.99 per month. The final level is the Elite plan, which includes $79.99 per month. Fubo also offers a fourth plan, Latino Quarterly, which does not offer a free trial, costs $33 per month and includes 34 Spanish-language channels, a DVR of 250 hours, and the ability to stream on up to three screens at the same time.

While Hulu+ With Live TV doesn’t offer a free trial, it does come with free subscriptions to Disney Plus (a value of $7.99 per month) and ESPN Plus (a value of $6.99 per month), saving subscribers a total of $14.98 per month from subscribing to these services individually. Hulu+ With Live TV costs $69.99 per month. Hulu+ With Live TV also comes with more than 75 channels, including MTV to watch the VMAs 2022. Hulu+ With Live TV also includes access to Hulu’s streaming library of thousands of TV shows and movies, including Hulu originals like The Handmaid’s Tale, Only Murders in the Building, The Kardashians, The Dropout, Little Fires Everywhere, Normal People and The Great. Other Hulu+ With Live TV features include the ability to stream on two screens at the same time, and an unlimited DVR service that saves live TV recordings for up to nine months and allows users to fast-forward to their favorite parts.

Image: Kevin Winter/MTV VMAs 2020/Getty Images for MTV.

Where are the VMAs 2022?

The MTV Video Music Awards 2022 will be held at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey.

The 2022 MTV Video Music Awards are an awards ceremony honoring the best music videos of the year hosted by MTV. The show will be hosted by LL Cool J, Nicki Minaj, and Jack Harlow. The ceremony will be held at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey on Sunday, August 28. Minaj will be honored with the Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award. Red Hot Chili Peppers will be honored with the Global Icon Award.[3]

Who are the VMAs 2022 hosts?

The MTV Video Music Awards 2022 hosts are LL Cool J, Nicki Minaj and Jack Harlow.

Who are the VMAs 2022 performers?

The MTV Video Music Awards 2022 performers include BLACKPINK, Bad Bunny and Lizzo. See below for a full list of VMAs 2022 performers.

VMAs 2022 pre-show performers

• Dove Cameron
• Saucy Santana – “Booty”
• Yung Gravy

VMAs 2022 main show performers

• Anitta – “Envolver”
• Bad Bunny
• J Balvin – “Nivel de Perreo”
• BLACKPINK – “Pink Venom”
• Kane Brown – “Grand”
• Eminem & Snoop Dogg – “From the D 2 the LBC”
• Jack Harlow
• Khalid & Marshmello – “Numb”
• Lizzo – “2 Be Loved (Am I Ready)”
• Måneskin – “Supermodel”
• Nicki Minaj – Medley
• Panic! at the Disco – “Middle of a Breakup”
• Red Hot Chili Peppers – Medley

What are the VMAs 2022 nominations?

The VMAs 2022 nominations include Doja Cat, Drake, Ed Sheeran, Harry Styles, Lil Nas X, Jack Harlow, Olivia Rodrigo and Taylor Swift. Nicki Minaj will receive the Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award. The Red Hot Chili Peppers will receive the Global Icon Award. See below for the VMAs 2022 nominations for Video of the Year, Song of the Year, Artist of the Year, and Best New Artist.

Video of the Year

• Doja Cat – “Woman”
• Drake (featuring Future and Young Thug) – “Way 2 Sexy”
• Ed Sheeran – “Shivers”
• Harry Styles – “As It Was”
• Lil Nas X & Jack Harlow – “Industry Baby”
• Olivia Rodrigo – “Brutal”
• Taylor Swift – All Too Well: The Short Film

Song of the Year

• Adele – “Easy on Me”
• Billie Eilish – “Happier Than Ever”
• Doja Cat – “Woman”
• Elton John & Dua Lipa – “Cold Heart (Pnau Remix)”
• Lizzo – “About Damn Time”
• The Kid Laroi & Justin Bieber – “Stay”

Artist of the Year

• Bad Bunny
• Drake
• Ed Sheeran
• Harry Styles
• Jack Harlow
• Lil Nas X
• Lizzo

Best New Artist 

• Baby Keem
• Dove Cameron
• Gayle
• Latto
• Måneskin
• Seventeen

The MTV Video Music Awards air on Sunday, August 28, 2022, at 8 p.m. ET / 5 p.m. PT on MTV. Here’s how to watch them for free.

Adblock test (Why?)

How to Watch VMAs 2022 Live Online Free: Where to Stream MTV Video Music Awards - STYLECASTER
Read More

How to watch MTV VMAs 2022 online: Free live streams (8/28/22) - cleveland.com

The 2022 MTV VMAs return as a celebration of music and its icons. Besides playing internationally on MTV, the show will be simulcast by a vast contingent of corporate siblings including BET, CMT, Comedy Central and Paramount Network, as well as on Paramount’s streaming service.

WATCH LIVE FOR FREE: Direct TV Stream (free trial) | Philo (free 7-day trial); FuboTV (free trial); Paramount+ (free 7-day trial); Hulu + Live TV (free trial)

The MTV Video Music Awards air live from Newark, N.J., this Sunday, Aug. 28, at 8 p.m. Eastern on MTV. Check out the complete list of VMA nominees. LL Cool J, Nicki Minaj and Jack Harlow will be sharing hosting duties this year.

Harlow joins Lil Nas X and Kendrick Lamar as the top nominees with seven each. They’re followed by Harry Styles and Doja Cat, who have six each. Tonight’s awards also feature 26 first-time nominees. Madonna becomes the first artist to be nominated in all five decades the show has aired, earning a nod for her album “Madame X.”

How to stream the MTV Movie & TV Awards online?

MTV is available on multiple streaming services, including DirecTV Stream (free trial, then $49.99 for the first two months), Paramount+ (1-week free trial, then $9.99/month) and Hulu + Live TV (free 7-day trial and $69.99/month thereafter), Sling TV ($10 for first month and $35/month thereafter), Philo (free trial, then $25/month) and FuboTV.

What channel is MTV on?

You can find which channel MTV is on by using these channel finders: Cox, WoW, Verizon Fios, AT&T U-verse, Comcast Xfinity, Spectrum/Charter, Optimum/Altice, DIRECTV and Dish.

Adblock test (Why?)

How to watch MTV VMAs 2022 online: Free live streams (8/28/22) - cleveland.com
Read More